cit., Vol. Dr. Scrivener was the one man that fought them tooth and nail all the way, but he was always outvoted. The most common violation is its pervasive tendency to subvert the most natural understanding of the Greek text in favour of a preferred religious view. Few graduate from those worldly institutions who do not accept it. This present book will concern itself with each of the above three items.(The Attack Intensifies, in worldincrisis.com). Translations in English with similar renderings include. In this book, she alleges that Westcott and Hort were practitioners of the occult. Reprinted with kind permission from theTraditional Text Pamphlets Homepage and compiled byDavid Blunt of the James Begg Society. They are called the Majority Text. They formed a school of religion and philosophy, which became the center of Christian learning and culture. They didnt believe in heaven or hell or that the Bible was the Word of God. Then continue reading more of Horts words below: The old dogmatic view of the Bible therefore, is not only open to attack from the standpoint of science and historical criticism, but IF TAKEN SERIOUSLY it becomes a DANGER to religion and public moralsGod is the author, NOT of the Bible BUT of the life in which the authors of the Bible partake, and of which they tell in such IMPERFECT HUMAN WORDS as they could command. Under the direction of the Translation Services Department, translation of the Old Testament in a particular language may be completed in as little as two years. May Committee of 18 elected to produce a Revised Version. July 31st Hort: I spoke of the gloomy prospect, should the Evangelicals carry on their present victory so as to alter the Services. (Life, Vol.I, p.160). [30] The United Bible Societies' text (1975) and the Nestle-Aland text (1979) were used to update the footnotes in the 1984 version. So the linguistic solution in any given case may be open to debate. and the details thereof. for private distribution only. The translators use the terms "Hebrew-Aramaic Scriptures" and "Christian Greek Scriptures" rather than "Old Testament" and "New Testament", stating that the use of "testament" was based on a misunderstanding of 2 Corinthians 3:14. In the Gospels alone Codex B (Vaticanus) leaves out words or whole clauses no less than 1,491 times. "[62] However, the translators of the New World Translation believed that the name Jehovah was present in the original manuscripts of the New Testament when quoting from the Old Testament, but replaced with the other terms by later copyists. This paper is not about the Jesuits as a whole, but shows that the Jesuits have their part to play in promoting the new bible versions, because they literally hate genuine Protestantism and the Bible they follow (KJAV). 1865 Sept. 27th Westcott: I have been trying to recall my impressions of La Salette (a marian shrine). Of course they were! Textual Criticism (part of Higher Criticism) began in earnest with Romanist Richard Simon in the 1600s. But the publication of the Scofield Bible resurrected the old Jesuit futurism with a Zionist twist.Today the policies of our country are dramatically influenced by futurism and Christian Zionism while few have even heard of historicism. "[15], Cees Houtman wrote of the Dutch translation in 1984: "respect and knowledge are the requirements that a translator must meet. Helvidius, the devout scholar of northern Italy (400 A.D.), who had the pure manuscripts, accused Jerome of using corrupt manuscripts on this text. May 17th the Revised Version is published in England, selling two million copies within four days. Wilhelm DeWette (1780-1849) applied it to Deuteronomy. (http://www.keithhunt.com/Bible12.html). Hort ordained priest in Church of England. It is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest. Some want you to think there is little difference between the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts and the rest of the over 5,000 Greek manuscripts, even Hort wanted people to believe that, and tried to say so in certain words, that some still quote today, BUT the TRUTH OF THE MATTER is CLEAR TO SEE for the scholars who will open their eyes to see the PLAIN truth., We need to note here that Dr.Hort, while a life-long opponent of the Received Text, and the man who dominated the English NT Revision Committee, did say this: An OVERWHELMING proportion of the text in all known cursive manuscripts except a few is, as a matter of fact, IDENTICAL (Horts Introduction, p.143). Much criticism of the New World Translation involves the rendering of certain texts in the New Testament considered to be biased in favor of specific Witness practices and doctrines. [90], In 2004, Anthony Byatt and Hal Flemings published their anthology 'Your Word is Truth', Essays in Celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (1950, 1953). The evidence is distilled down into a single page, which is broken up into the following categories: 1) What they did. Once Latin became the exclusive playground of the scholars, the texts could not be checked. Warfield is here saying something important for those who want to know the origin of the new versions. Genesis 1:1-46; 28; Psalms 106-138; Matthew 16:2-3; Mark 16:9-20; The Pastoral Epistles (1 & 2 Timothy and Titus); Hebrews 9:14-13:25 and all of the book of Revelation. [141][142][143][125][144][145] These include: The New World Translation was banned in Russia in 2017,[148] after the prosecution used quotes from Wikipedia to argue that the translation is extremist and not a true Bible. Your email address will not be published. It cannot be denied that the Satanic hand of Rome is deeply involved; indeed, she is the patron of the literary craftsmen behind the new versions. (Brookes Cartwright, p. 256, quoted in The New Testament Translation, the Jesuit Counter-Attack bible, referencing the Jesuit Bible of 1582). They were known to be the chief architects of the critical theory which resulted in the revised Greek Testament which has replaced the Textus Receptus (TR) or Received Text. What a heinous mix of good and bad! This acceptance of Tischendorf by atheism is also shown in a quote used onhttp://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/quote-t.htm, If the New Testament is defective the church itself is in error, and must be given up as adeception.. June Mr. Daniel Macmillan suggests to Hort that he should take part in an interesting and comprehensive New Testament Scheme. Hort was to edit the text in conjunction with Mr. Westcott; the latter was to be responsible for a commentary, and Lightfoot was to contribute a N.T. A list of vernacular equivalents is then composed. they are three of the most scandalously corrupt copies extant [exhibiting] the most shamefully mutilated texts which are anywhere to be met with.(Burgon, True Or False? 3rd Hort: But the book which has most engaged me is Darwin. As early as 1853 they began work on their Greek text of the New Testament: this project was to occupy most of their remaining lives. He gives himself up for the church.(Clement of Alexandria, quoted in Newmans Arians, p. 81). It was noted above that in the past distrust was often expressed regarding the translation work of persons belonging to a different modality or denomination and there was a fear of the theological points of view being reflected in the translation. There are enough joined dots in this paper to bring this about! Sept. 4th Westcott and Horts The New Testament in the Original Greek Vol.II published (Introduction and Appendix). . Many Catholic and Protestant scholars have accused this Bible of flaws and biased interpretations. Here the Jesuits assembled a company of learned scholars..and from here they directed the movements of Philip 2 of Spain as he prepared a GREAT FLEET to CRUSH England and bring it back to the FEET of the POPE. Rome can only rule over ignorant, fear-filled people. I. BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT (1825-1901) A. The device is known as mental reservation and was used in these tracts.(worldincrisis). Robert Countess, The Jehovah's Witness' New Testament, A Critical Analysis of the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures, Presbyterian & Reformed, 1982. In 1851 Westcott was ordained an Anglican priest and Hort in 1856: their careers were spent mostly in academic positions rather than pastorates. I have been surprised, in comparing the Revised Testament with other versions, to find how many of the changes, which are important and valuable, have been anticipated by the Rhemish translation, which now forms a part of what is known as the Douay Bible And yet a careful comparison of these new translations with the Rhemish Testament, shows them, in many instances, to be simply a return to this old version, and leads us to think that possibly there were as finished scholars three hundred years ago as now, and nearly as good apparatus for the proper rendering of the original text.. Do not forget that Hort always considered the KJAV to be disgusting to his senses, and referred to that vile Textus Receptus with much venom. But the mind was set by these so-called scholars to trash the Textus Receptus.(Hunt). Jehovah's WitnessesProclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993) Chap. Does this not warn you strongly against W&H and all the new versions? The author gives many more examples of how the Jesuit bible is simply transferred to modern titles. (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (Christian Lit. As a pre-degree theology student with a well-known evangelical Bible school, I had to study Bultmann (much admired by one of the deacons in my church and one of my examiners), plus other unbelievers. No such reason impelled the Jesuits of Rheims. These serious accusations are made with very strong evidence from the letters of both . Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. [39], Former high-ranking Watch Tower staff have identified various members of the translation team. Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults Revised, Updated, and Expanded Anniversary Edition, Bethany House Publishers, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1997, p. 125. The Oxford Movement, one that we see is of Roman/Jesuit origin, corrupted the Anglican church by teaching its future priests in the ways of Rome. Sadly, the average churchgoer doesn't realize it, and worst, the one's that have been warned don't care enough to Please research the evidence. If he be condemned, what will become of me? (Life, Vol.I,p.94). At others it is neither modern nor scholarly. It also seems not surprising that Westcott would call the Jesuit inspired Oxford Movement, "the Oxford Revival!" "The Oxford Revival in the middle of the century, quickened anew that sense of corporate life. Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort, 19th century theologians and Bible scholars, did groundbreaking work in textual criticism.Their scholarship advanced the science of textual criticism and bolstered the claim that the biblical text has been accurately preserved. Were Westcott and Hort Secret Practitioners of the Occults? It has been noted that Sinaiticus is a literary mess (scionofzion.com): There are mistakes, erasures, sentences written on top of other sentences plus many words are omitted. Note how this statement was made at the same time that the Higher Critics were gaining ground in theology, and just before W&H began their own work of destruction of the word. Indeed, I find the support obnoxious if such Christians have had the opportunity to examine the evidences found in this series of papers, and in many other sources. Later, as a soldier, he was crippled by a wound and so entered into more spiritual activities. No, I am not talking about conspiracy theories which are often based on flights of fancy, but about actual attempts to repeat actions and words, etc. Westcott and Hort were two non-Christian Anglican ministers. The following quote is by Hort: Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and Letters of Fenton John Hort, New York, 1896, Vol 1, p81. Yes it is easy to outwit most Christians with lies. By 1845, it was obvious that Newman had accomplished all he could secretly, so he then openly left the Church of England. By 1989, the New World Translation was translated into eleven languages, with more than 56,000,000 copies printed. Westcott & Hort gave all the appearances of being pious and devout and devoted to finding the true and original words of the New Testament. (Baron von Tischendorf, quoted in John E Remsberg, The Christ, p. 272). Rhodes R, The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions, The Essential Guide to Their History, Their Doctrine, and Our Response, Zondervan, 2001, p. 94, Bruce M Metzger, "Jehovah's Witnesses and Jesus Christ," Theology Today, (April 1953 p. 74); see also Metzger, "The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures," The Bible Translator (July 1964), C.H. Sept. 29th Westcott to Hort: As to our proposed recension of the New Testament text, our object would be, I suppose, to prepare a text for common and general useWith such an end in view, would it not be best to introduce only certain emendations into the received text, and to note in the margin such as seem likely or noticeable after Griesbachs manner?I feel most keenly the disgrace of circulating what I feel to be falsified copies of Holy Scripture (a reference to the A.V.? Do not be disillusioned Rome was 100% behind the attack on the KJAV: The Catholic most responsible for directing Protestant aggression against the Authorized Version was Cardinal Nicholas Patrick Stephen Wiseman (1802-1865). Textual criticism cannot be divorced entirely from theology. [88] In 1985, Alan Stewart Duthie responded to the assertion by Fee & Stuart that the NWT is "filled with the heretical doctrines of this cult",[89] stating that although "there are some heretical doctrines to be found [it] does not reach even 0.1% of the whole, which is very far from 'full'". [21][22] Work began on December 2, 1947, when the "New World Bible Translation Committee" was formed, composed of Jehovah's Witnesses who professed to be anointed. The Authorized Version of the Bible is the precepts of a mighty nation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtUfgtgB_Is, http://www.vaticanassassins.org/highly-recommended-chris-pintos-superb-video-the-untold-history-of-the-bible/, http://www.cobourgatheist.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1210:how-the-bible-was-written-and-is-a-forgery&catid=25:the-bible&Itemid=107, http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/quote-t.htm, Putins War Spoils Zelenskys Dream; Lithuania Opposes Ukraine entry into NATO, Russia Launches Massive Air, Land and Sea Attacks on Ukraine. More and more scholars were coming forth who were openly putting to one side all the mass of manuscript evidence that supported each other, agreed together, and putting their mind-set on a relatively few, which we have seen did not agree with each other. I urge all readers to abandon EVERY modern version and to return to the KJV. Aug. 11th Westcott: I never read an account of a miracle (in Scripture?) Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. Once they gained the trust of the already cautious Christians, they betrayed them to the atheistic authorities. I find it hard to understand why any Christian would want to side with such a man as him, or W&H! pp.251,252). As a youngster he was known to be treacherous, brutal and vindictive. Bearing in mind that the Jesuits are Romes storm-troopers, and no branch of Romanism can carry on without Romes order and blessing, look at what Jesuits say about the Bible (in a Jesuit meeting in Cheri, Italy, 1825), thegenuineBible that can be traced back through the centuries to thegenuinesources: Then the Bible, that serpent which with head erect and eyes flashing, threatens us (the Jesuits) with its venom while it trails along the ground, shall be changed into a rod as soon as we (the Jesuits) are able to seize itfor three centuries past this cruel asp has left us no repose. He is generally regarded as the founder of Old Testament criticism. (Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, p. 476). Hort said this and so does the Catholic Encyclopaedia (Vol 4, p492). "[57] He also considers that old manuscripts containing the tetragram, like the papyrus Fouad 266, "is evidence of a secondary stage. A database of Greek and Hebrew terms is available where a translator has difficulty rendering a verse. Does this fact prove just how unreliable the new versions are? As I have suggested elsewhere, the monks wanted to burn the supposed Sinaiticus because it was such a bad manuscript! And Moses was not one of them.. Dodd: "The reason why [the Word was a god] is unacceptable is that it runs counter to the current of Johannine thought, and indeed of Christian thought as a whole. "[112], Frederick E. Mayer wrote in 1954: "It is a version that lends support to denial of doctrines which the Christian churches consider basic, such as the co-equality of Jesus Christ with the Father, the personhood of the Holy Spirit, and the survival of the human person after physical death. I do not doubt that many genuine believers have been caught by this mixture, because of their regard for Strong. Ignorant people are now saying that the Authorized King James Bible is wrong because they have believed the scholarship of these two blaspheming infidels. [132][129] In rebuttal, Thomas Howe strongly criticized BeDuhn's positive review of the New World Translation, stating that BeDuhn's main goal is to deny the deity of Christ. According to the publishers, better manuscript evidence had made it possible to determine with greater accuracy what the original writers intended, particularly in more obscure passages, allowing linguists to better understand certain aspects of the original languages. Had I been alone I could have knelt there for hours. (Life, Vol.I, p.81). Hort and Westcott were committed Communists. Westcott and Horts Greek New Testament is the source text for many of todays modern Bible translations. This is the reason why the liberals in our own denomination have been able to make such rapid inroads! cit., Vol. So, we can expect new versions to adopt the same attitude in order to destroy the KJAV it goes way back to their source: He [the Christian] both thinks and speaks the truth; except when consideration is necessary, and then, as a physician for the good of his patient, he will be false, or utter a falsehood . In 1832, John Henry Newman (1801-1890), vicar of St. Marys at Oxford, went to southern Europe, accompanied by Richard Hurrell Froude (1803-1836), another secret Catholic. He organized secret Catholics (including Jesuit agents planted in the church and university) into a working whole. 1890 Mar. Rome is delighted that new versions base their work not on the original, authentic sources of the Bible they curse, the KJAV, but on the corrupt sources of the Alexandrian school, to which they subscribe. [136], In 2004, Xabier Pikaza wrote of the Spanish translation, "Traduccin del Nuevo Mundo is the name given by Jehovah's Witnesses to their version of the Bible, which is based on the conviction that the other versions, in all languages, are somehow tainted by the presuppositions of the various churches and Christian confessions. Thus, the church (Rome) is the final authority, not Christ or Gods word. They were responsible for replacing the Universal Text of the Authorized Version with the Local Text of Egypt and the Roman Catholic Church. Remember, too, that both W&H were entranced by the theories of Charles Darwin. They included essays responding to criticism of the New World Translation from non-Witnesses, and a bibliography of reviews of the work. . Why would the Catholics do this? Higher criticism consists of vicious speculative theories by liberals, in an attempt to undermine the authorship of Scripture. THE EVIDENCE IS AT LEAST 618 TO 2!. I had learnt, like other Protestant children, that the Pope was the Antichrist, and that Gregory VII had been a special revelation of that being. 1, p. 52 [August 31, 1847]. A. Hort (1881) was used as the basis for translating the New Testament into English. Letters and words, even whole sentences, are frequently written twice over, or begun and immediately cancelled; while that gross blunder, whereby a clause is omitted because it happens to end in the same words as the clause preceding, occurs no less than 115 times in the New Testament.. It was the Christians who replaced the Tetragrammaton by Kyrios, when the divine name written in Hebrew letters was not understood any more. Dr. Smith communicated but said afterwards that he did not join in reciting the Nicene Creed and did not compromise his principles as a Unitarian. Even the New World Translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses can survive the scrutiny of the critics. We heartily recommend the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures, published in 1950 by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. "[102], Steven T. Byington said in 1950, "the book does not give enjoyable continuous reading; but if you are digging for excellent or suggestive renderings, this is among the richer mines. Dr. Westcott has been unconsciously influenced into a pro-Roman Catholic attitude. On the following passages from the Scriptures, we have examined The Twentieth Century, Fenton, Goodspeed, Moffatt, Moulton, Noyes, Rotherham, Weymouth, and Douay. It must be askedwhythe majority of Christians today are reading new versions, when they are founded on mostly Romanist manuscripts, one of them probably a fake? Eusebius had the choice of using the Greek manuscripts from Antioch or from Alexandria to make up the 50 Greek Bibles. [52] The complete New World Translation has been published in more than one hundred languages or scripts, with the New Testament available in more than fifty additional languages. I must work out and examine the argument in more detail, but at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable. (Life, Vol.I, p.416). Desperate to ward off these closing events of human history and, hopefully, to quench them entirely, Satan began turning loose on the world a flood of error, apostasy, and perversion. One need only read the letters between these two "gentlemen" to see their thoroughly black-hearted correspondence and intent to confuse and change God's Word. The true Bible turns unlearned and ignorant men into gospel preachers and casts out all fear.. The English mission, a bold attempt to reclaim England for Catholicism during the reign (1558 1603) of Elizabeth I, was led by Edmund Campion and included the poet Robert Southwell. Same goes for any other letter. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901), and Fenton J A Hort (1828-1892) were two renowned Anglican scholars at Cambridge University. 1862 Apr. He immediately left the city of Rome, declaring, I have a work to do in England. (It was on the return voyage that he wrote the words for the hymn we so often sing, Lead kindly Light, amid the encircling gloom. He felt God was leading him out of Protestantism, back to the Mother Church.). One need only read the letters between these two "gentlemen" to see their thoroughly black-hearted correspondence and intent to confuse and change God's Word.
Cirque Du Soleil Tysons Parking,
Viviana Lletget Covid,
Judge Lafayette Death,
Most Liberal Cities In The United States,
Mark Worman Cars For Sale,
Articles W